|
|
|
Article Cited by others ORIGINAL ARTICLE
A prospective, randomised, double-blind study of comparative efficacy of immediate versus daily cleaning of stethoscope using 66% ethyl alcohol
Parmar Ramesh C, Valvi Chayya C, Sira Poonam, Kamat Jaishree R
Year : 2004| Volume: 58| Issue : 10 | Page no: 423-430 | This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Bacterial contamination of stethoscopes used by health workers: Public health implications |
|
| | Uneke, C.J., Ogbonna, A., Oyibo, P.G., Onu, C.M. | | | Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2010; 4(7): 436-441 | | | [Pubmed] [Google Scholar] | | | 2 |
Whatæs growing on your stethoscope? (And what you can do about it) |
|
| | Schroeder, A., Schroeder, M.A., DæAmico, F. | | | Journal of Family Practice. 2009; 58(8): 404-409 | | | [Pubmed] [Google Scholar] | | | 3 |
Contamination of stethoscopes with MRSA and current disinfection practices |
|
| | Fenelon, L., Holcroft, L., Waters, N. | | | Journal of Hospital Infection. 2009; 71(4): 376-378 | | | [Pubmed] [Google Scholar] | | | 4 |
A simple effective clean practice protocol significantly improves hand decontamination and infection control measures in the acute surgical setting |
|
| | Howard, D.P.J., Williams, C., Sen, S., Shah, A., Daurka, J., Bird, R., Loh, A., Howard, A. | | | Infection. 2009; 37(1): 34-38 | | | [Pubmed] [Google Scholar] | |
|
|
