Indian J Med Sci About us | Subscription  |  Top cited articles | Contact Us | Feedback | Login   
Print this page Email this page   Small font size Default font size Increase font size 
 Users Online : 91
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Back Issues  Instructions Search e-Alerts
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
 ¤  Next article
 ¤  Previous article 
 ¤  Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
 ¤   Similar in PUBMED
 ¤  Search Pubmed for
 ¤  Search in Google Scholar for
 ¤   Article in PDF (40 KB)
 ¤   Citation Manager
 ¤   Access Statistics
 ¤   Reader Comments
 ¤   Email Alert *
 ¤   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


  In this article
 ¤  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1033    
    Printed42    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded56    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 62  |  Issue : 12  |  Page : 499
 

Authors' reply


1 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
2 Department of Pediatrics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India

Correspondence Address:
Tanmay S Panchabhai
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5359.48558

Get Permissions



How to cite this article:
Panchabhai TS, Gogtay NJ, Bavdekar SB. Authors' reply. Indian J Med Sci 2008;62:499

How to cite this URL:
Panchabhai TS, Gogtay NJ, Bavdekar SB. Authors' reply. Indian J Med Sci [serial online] 2008 [cited 2013 May 24];62:499. Available from: http://www.indianjmedsci.org/text.asp?2008/62/12/499/48558


Sir,

We are grateful to Dr. Oshikoya for his interest [1] in our report of a case of paracetamol angioedema. [2] We offer the following responses:

We agree that viral infection could be a possible cause for angioedema in children. However, as detailed in the case report, the morphological characteristics of the initial rash and the rash that developed following the exposure to paracetamol were different, suggesting separate etiologies. More importantly, the attack of angioedema was not an isolated one. The child developed angioedema (day 3) which did not subside through days 4 and 5, when the child continued to receive paracetamol from his general practitioner. The child was admitted to our facility on day 5. A thorough past medical history did not reveal any past history of angioedema. The fact that angioedema subsided as soon as administration of paracetamol was suspended supports our conclusion of a probable adverse reaction. We would like to point out that the initial rash that the child had developed due to a presumed viral infection subsided four days after the angioedema, again pointing to a possible role of paracetamol in this adverse reaction. We agree that a supervised oral challenge test is the definitive means of diagnosing paracetamol-induced angioedema. This test, however, could not be performed as parents refused permission.

Paracetamol is readily available in India in packaged formulations and hence storage at home resulting in increased toxicity and adverse reactions is unlikely though possible. By eliciting a discussion, we seem to have succeeded in our objective of creating and increasing awareness amongst general practitioners about the possibility of adverse reactions with paracetamol, which is known to have an excellent safety record.

 
 ¤ References Top

1.Oshikoya KA. Re: Paracetamol induced angioedema. Indian J Med Sci 2008;62;497-9.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Panchabhai TS, Gogtay NJ, Bavdekar SB. Paracetamol induced angioedema. Indian J Med Sci 2008;62:420-2.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

© 2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published by Medknow
Online since 15th December '04