Indian J Med Sci About us | Subscription  |  Top cited articles | Contact Us | Feedback | Login   
Print this page Email this page   Small font size Default font size Increase font size 
 Users Online : 120
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Back Issues  Instructions Search e-Alerts
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
 ¤  Next article
 ¤  Previous article 
 ¤  Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
 ¤   Similar in PUBMED
 ¤  Search Pubmed for
 ¤  Search in Google Scholar for
 ¤Related articles
 ¤   [PDF Not available] *
 ¤   Citation Manager
 ¤   Access Statistics
 ¤   Reader Comments
 ¤   Email Alert *
 ¤   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


  In this article
 ¤  Abstract
 ¤  Material and methods
 ¤  Results
 ¤  Discussion
 ¤  References
 ¤  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4875    
    Printed88    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2003  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 68-70
 

Characterisation, biotyping, antibiogram and klebocin typing of Klebsiella with special reference to Klebsiella oxytoca.


Department of Microbiology, Govt. Medical College, Amritsar,

Correspondence Address:
A Aggarwal
Department of Microbiology, Govt. Medical College, Amritsar

Login to access the Email id


PMID: 14514272

Get Permissions

 ¤ Abstract 

400 strains of Klebsiellae identified by culture characteristics and biochemical reactions were subjected to biotyping, antibiogram and klebocin typing. Based on indole production, pectin and gelatin liquefaction 16.0% of all the isolates were Klebsiella oxytoca. Maximum sensitivity was shown to Amikacin (72%) and maximum resistance to Ampicillin (87.5%). Klebocin typability was 73.5%. So by combining biotyping, antibiogram and Klebocin typing, Klebsiella could be differentiated better than based on any single marker.


Keywords: Anti-Bacterial Agents, pharmacology,Bacteriocins, pharmacology,Enterobacter aerogenes, classification,drug effects,isolation & purification,Human, Klebsiella oxytoca, classification,drug effects,isolation & purification,Microbial Sensitivity Tests,


How to cite this article:
Aggarwal A, Khanna S, Arora U. Characterisation, biotyping, antibiogram and klebocin typing of Klebsiella with special reference to Klebsiella oxytoca. Indian J Med Sci 2003;57:68-70

How to cite this URL:
Aggarwal A, Khanna S, Arora U. Characterisation, biotyping, antibiogram and klebocin typing of Klebsiella with special reference to Klebsiella oxytoca. Indian J Med Sci [serial online] 2003 [cited 2013 May 23];57:68-70. Available from: http://www.indianjmedsci.org/text.asp?2003/57/2/68/11888


During the past decade emphasis on hospital infection has shifted dramatically from the Staphylococcus to the gram negative bacilli.[1] Klebsiella species in particular have played a significant role in gram negative sepsis often caused by strains resistant to common antibiotics. The apparent ease with which these organisms can spread especially to debilitating patients is a matter of concern.[2] This organism was isolated from variety of nosocomial infections, the commonest being urinary tract, respiratory tract and then surgical wounds. The widespread distribution of multidrug resistant Klebsiellae in the hosptial suggested that reservoir was extensive.[3] Based on DNA relatedness studies the genus now consists of five species: Klebsiella pneumoniae, K.oxytoca,  K.planticola Scientific Name Search , K.terrigens and Klebsiella group 47. Until recently indole positive strains of Klebsiella were considered to be an indole positive biogroup of Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, in 1974 Jain and co- workers showed that indole positive strains were distinct from K.pneumoniae by DNA hybridization. Thus K.oxytoca is now recognised as a separate species. Although the genus Klebsiella has become more complex, the species can usually be differentiated by simple phenotypic tests.[4]

The present study was aimed at isolation of Klebsiella species from various clinical specimens, their biochemical characterisation, to find the incidence of K.oxytoca, klebocin typing and the antibiogram of the isolates.


 ¤ Material and methods Top


400 strains of Klebsiella were isolated from various clinical samples received in the department of Microbiology, Govt. Medical College, Amritsar. All the strains were subjected to biotyping, antibiotic sensitivity testing and klebocin typing by standard procedures.[5] Antibiotic sensitivity tests were carried out by modified stokes methods. Antibiotics used were Ampicillin (10mg/disc), Gentamicin (10 mg/disc), Norfloxacin (10 mg/disc). Amikacin (30 mg/disc), Piperacillin (30 mg/disc), Cefotaxime (10 mg/disc) and Cephalexin (30 mg/disc).


 ¤ Results Top


It was observed that majority of strains were isolated from pus (5.4%), urine (42%), sputum (1.5%), blood (1%), throat swab, pleural fluids and other fluids (0.5%) each. Out of-400 Klebsiella strains 336 (84%) were Klebsiella aerogenes and 64 (16%) were Klebsiella oxytoca. 72% strains were sensitive to Amikacin, 57% to Gentamicin and 53% to Piperacillin. Maximum resistance was shown to Ampicillin and Cephalexin, 87.5% and 60% respectively. The commonest kl`ebocin types were 444, 111, 313, 113 [Table - 1]


 ¤ Discussion Top


Biotyping of Klebsiella species showed two species. K.aerogenes and Klebsiella oxytoca. All klebsiella aerogenes (pneumoniae) were isolated from blood of neonatal sepsis. Other workers also found klebsiella pneumoniar as the commonest isolate of neonatal sepsis.[6] All the 16% strains of. Klebsiella oxytoca were indole positive, liquefied gelatin and pectin. These results were similar to the findings of other workers, they also correlated indole positivity with liquefaction of pectin and gelatin in strains of Klebsiella oxytoca.[7],[8],[9],[10]

In the present study maximum strains were sensitive to Amikacin (72%) which is in accordance with other workers.[11] Maximum resistance was shown to Ampicillin which is similar to findings of other workers.[12],[13] It was further observed that lndole producing strains were isolated from hospital/ward environment and were having wide patterns of resistance than indole negative strains which is comparable with the study of others."[14]

Klebocin typability in the present study was 73.5% while Chug et a1[15] reported 80.6%. Klebocin pattern in our study was also somewhat similar to that obtained by these workers.

It may be concluded that by combining biotyping, antibiogram and Klebocin typing, Klebsiella could be differentiated better than based, on any single marker for tracing the source of nosocomial infection. Valuable antibiotics should be employed only when specifically indicated to avoid emergence of resistant bacteria.

 
 ¤ References Top

1.Editorial, Epidemiology of Klebsiella infections Lancet 1971;2:416-7.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Heedle GW, Mitchell AFG. Evaluation and application of an Improved bacteriocin typing method for Klebsiella aerogenes J. Clin Patho 1978;31:16-51.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Wolfgang et al. Enterobacteriaceae: General charadteristics and opportuist enterobacteriaceae. Zinser Microbiology 10th Ed. 1988;462 & 467.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Benner EJ, Michklewart JS, Brodie JL, Kirby WMM: (Proc Soc Exp Biol NY 1965;119:536. Cited in Topley and Wilson, 1975.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Coffee GJ, Marmion PB, Fraser GA, Simmons A Mackie and McCartney Practical. Medical Microbiology, Vol. 11, 14th Ed. 368-69, New York, Churchill Livingstone; 1996.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Prashar A, Kumar A. Clinical approach to neonatal sepsis. Paediatrics Today, 2001;4:493-9.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Rennie RP, Duncan IBR. Combined biochemical and serological typing of clinical isolates of Klebsiella. Ind J Med Res 1982;76:368-70.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Edmondson AS, Marycooke E, Wilcock APD. A companson of properties of Klebsiella strains isolated from different sources. Appl Med Micro 1980;13:541-50.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Lautrop H. Gelatin liquifying Klebsiella strains (Bacterum oxytocum). Acta Path Microbiol Scand 1956;39:375-7.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Arora DR. Textbook of microbiology, 1st Ed. 289, New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Jasper D, Molly T, Shanmugam J. In vitro susceptibility of gram negative bacteria to Amikacin and its comparison with three other aminoglycoside antibiotics. Ind J Pat4 Micror 1985;28:115-9.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Rao RR, Shivananda. Urease production, Itlebocin sensitivity and antibiotic resistance of klebsiella organisms. Indian J Med Microbiology 1993;11:36-42.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Anivkar AR, Deshmukh AB, Karyakarte RP, Dainle AS, et al: One year prospective study of 3280 surgical wounds. Ind J Med Microbiol 1999;17:129-32.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Klein D, Spindler JA, Matson JM. Relationship of Indole production and antibiotic susceptibility in the Klebsiella bacillus. J Clin Microbiol 1975;2:425-9.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Chug TD, Sabharwal U, Arora DR, et al. Klebocin typing: A national survey. Indian J Med Res 1982;75:791-5.  Back to cited text no. 15    


Tables

[Table - 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

© 2004 - Indian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published by Medknow
Online since 15th December '04